|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Historical
context Georg Luger was born in Steinach, This means that the work area of Luger,
in his role as consultant, was not limited to DWM but that he also
represented the other daughter companies as well as the Loewe parent company
during the years to come. The hand written correspondence from Georg Luger,
addressed to Paul Mauser, illustrate this. Having excellent contacts in
Austria, Luger was able to respond to issues that developed at competing arms
companies and which could hurt his employers (and indirectly his own)
finances. Owing to his role within the Loewe group, Georg Luger was able to
pursue his own private projects, paid for by the company itself. This created
a certain amount of tension, especially when the company felt they were being
squeezed financially by Luger, trying to make money on improvements which he
had developed in that same company’s time, with company budget and
resources. The scheme was to develop certain improvements, protect them by
patenting them in his own name and then licensing the rights to the company.
Further problems were created by the fact that the development of an
effective automatic (repeating) rifle design was the ‘holy grail’
of those days: A project that everybody in this relatively small world was
pursuing. In this aspect, Paul Mauser and Georg Luger were adversaries as
well as partners and there are examples of allegations from Mauser towards
Luger about Luger trying to patent improvements that Mauser claimed as his
own. The same pattern can be seen in the case of the development of the
Parabellum pistol, by improving the Borchardt design and Borchardts anger
about the fact that most major pistol developers copied his cartridge design
(which has also been credited to Luger). Seen in this light, the Georg Luger
correspondence illustrates why he was successful at his work: He knew the
relatively small world very well, he spoke his languages and travelled
regularly and he was not afraid to use the same tactics as his competitors,
which were not always civil and honest. He knew how to play the public
opinion and that of the military acceptance boards. These factors made him
both an asset and a risk factor at the same time and this may explain why he
always remained somewhat of an outsider, and never rose to a senior
management role within the Loewe group, of which Mauser was part. ---------------------------------------------------------- Pictures and information presented on this web
site may not be used in whole, or in part, without prior written permission from the
author and copyright holder. |